You are viewing [info]yesthattom's journal

Tom's Journal Below are the 10 most recent journal entries recorded in the "Tom" journal:

[<< Previous 10 entries]

January 18th, 2012
08:38 pm
[User Picture]

[Link]

Short version:

  • In 1964 Martin Luther King, Jr was named Time Magazine's Person of the Year.
  • In February he spoke at Drew University (I would attend 23 years later).
  • You can hear his speech here: http://www.drew.edu/about/history/celebrating-dr-king%E2%80%99s-legacy
  • An interesting point about the speech: it was given 5 days before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed. The speech ends with a call to action similar to what we hear today ("call your congressperson").
  • I heard a recording of that speech when I was working on the New Jersey LGBT civil rights bill in 1991. It changed my life.
  • A few months later, in July 1964, protests broke out in the town because of a racist barbershop. Soon after NJ passed a law saying that barber's could not discriminate.


Now you can hear Martin Luther King, Jr's speech:
http://www.drew.edu/about/history/celebrating-dr-king%E2%80%99s-legacy

Longer version:

In 1964, in Madison, New Jersey: So, this racist barber refused service to black people. He didn't have the balls to admit publicly that he was a racist so he cowardly claimed "I just don't have the tools or knowledge to cut that kind of hair".

It was not housing, however, but haircuts that brought Madison to national attention in the spring of 1964. When a black man was refused service in a local barbershop (on the grounds that the white barber did not know how to cut black hair), Drew [University] students and others began picketing the barbershop. It was not long before national television networks sent their cameras and the "barbershop incident" was in full bloom. There was pressure exerted on Grace Church to take some official stance, but action came from Drew students. The Drew civil rights group which had been using meeting rooms in Grace was the subject of an extensive discussion at a vestry meeting
quoted from http://www.gracemadison.org/History.aspx

Later that year New Jersey passed a law that to receive a barber license you had to be able to cut hair of white and black people, thus removing this frivolous and cowardly excuse.

While I can find a number of accounts of "the barbershop controversy" I can't find a single one that points out that MLK, Jr. had given a major speech just a few months earlier. I would think there would be a connection.

(1 comment | Leave a comment)

January 11th, 2012
06:44 am
[User Picture]

[Link]

New Hampshire Results
NEW HAMPSHIRE RESULTS

First Place: Mitt "I abused my dog" Romney -- Well the party insiders are doing well at maintaining their candidate. The D.C. insider "conventional wisdom" is that it is "Mitt's turn". Sadly he lies constantly and everyone knows it, is stiffer than Gore, conservatives hate him and fundamentalists consider his religion "a cult".

Second Place: Ron Paul. If gay people dream of moving to the utopia that is San Francisco, Libertarians dream of moving to New Hampshire. So, of course he did well here. But... wait... it is an "open primary" which means you don't have to be a Republican to vote it the Republican primary here. So it is estimated that nearly 50% of voters weren't Republican. And he got a distant second? Did you know there is a webcrawler that finds new webpages on the internet that mention Ron Paul and post automated pro-Paul propaganda if there is a comments section? I guess that strategy didn't win the votes people expected.

Third Place: Huntsman. His "I'm the only non-crazy person running" theme is doing well with the voters. I actually like this guy... except that he's so anti-choice that he makes... hmm... damn, I need a good analogy here. I bet Archer would have the perfect thing to say. I actually think this guy is the only person that would have a chance at beating Obama.

Fourth Place: Newt Gingrich. Sadly the SuperPACs he is running against him used what could only be described as "political hate speech" in a flood of TV adverts and that really hurt him. "Political Hate Speech" is a recent thing. It didn't exist 20-30 years ago. It was invented in the 1990s by a guy who not just invented it, but he wrote about it and gave private Republican-only trainings on how to do it. He said "every time there is a camera in front of you call your opponent a traitor and un-American". Fellow Republicans that refused his advice were scolded and called "old fashioned" and were pushed from the party. Sadly that guy was basically kicked out of the party in a financial scandal combined with an adultery scandal. What ever happened to that guy? Oh wait, it was Newt Gingrich! Gosh, blow-back is a bitch!

Fifth Place: Santorum. If you hate everyone, you'll love Santorum. Especially if you hate gays... well, not all gays, just the ones that are going to destroy the world because they want Marriage Equality.

Sixth Place: Perry. Remember when he joined the race and conservatives said he's a clone of George Bush, Jr. and would go all the way? With 1% of the vote, why is he even staying in the race?


There ya have it.


Oh wait...

You may have noticed that I mentioned that Mitt Romney abused his dog. Was that unfair? He did strap his dog to the top of his car and drive from Mass to Canada at 60-70 miles per hour "as punishment for what the dog had done". That has about as much to do with whether or not he'd be a good president as the fact that Obama's middle name is "Hussein". So, we should only mention this dog thing as often as Republicans mentioned that Obama's middle name is Hussein... right? Oh wait, they gave Obama's full name every... fucking... time... they... could while on the campaign trail.

(6 comments | Leave a comment)

January 1st, 2012
10:37 am
[User Picture]

[Link]

71 reasons why LGBT and LGBT-friendly people should campaign for Obama
In 2008 someone from Chicago told me, "Obama lucked out and never happened to be elected in a year that a major gay rights vote was happening. He won't do anything for gays if he's elected to be president. Never has. Never will."

Well, my friend was wrong 71 different ways:

In its first 35 months, the Obama Administration has...

(1 comment | Leave a comment)

10:31 am
[User Picture]

[Link]

Mit Romney would have done none of these things, and will reverse most of them when elected.
He appointed a magnificent Secretary of State, killed Osama Bin Laden, decimated the top ranks of Al-Qaeda, ended the war in Iraq, brought all those troops home as he said he would, set a timetable to end the war in Afghanistan, helped to inspire the Arab Spring, led the world in toppling Qaddafi – rather more cost-effectively than his predecessor toppled Saddam – restored America's standing among the community of nations, signed the new START Treaty, was pictured on the cover of New York Magazine as “The First Jewish President” yet improved our standing with Muslims.

He sextupled the number of stem cell lines available to researchers whose work may one day save your child’s life, appointed the nation’s first Chief Technology Officer, averted depression, saved the auto industry, cut taxes for small businesses, cut taxes for the middle class, signed Dodd-Frank, signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, lifted the Global Gag Rule on family planning, removed the co-pay for contraception, appointed two progressive women to the Supreme Court, extended health insurance to tens of millions of Americans an estimated 45,000 of whom were dying each year for lack of it, paid for that additional coverage with a surtax on high-income individuals, doubled the CAFE standard, kick-started alternative energy technology, promulgated the first mercury/arsenic air pollution regulations; launched an educational ‘race to the top,’ ended the college-loan bank boondoggle, extended college affordability, launched the serve.gov national database of volunteer opportunities, launched recovery.gov to disclose Recovery Act outlays and accept public reports of fraud or waste, advanced LGBT equality 71 different ways, has us poised to cut the military budget, ramped up regulation of credit cards, ramped up FDA authority over tobacco, launched the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, opened the White House visitor log to public scrutiny, refused all federal lobbyist and PAC money . . . all this, and more, in the face of the most truculent opposition in living memory that kept us from accomplishing even more with less compromise.

(Leave a comment)

December 17th, 2011
09:23 am
[User Picture]

[Link]

"According to Rick, what we really need in the White House is someone delusional who thinks that an ancient caveman text gives him the right to discriminate against patriotic American soldiers and use government resources to indoctrinate children into his caveman cult. Or something. Maybe I’m not smart enough to understand but that’s what it sounds like to me, anyhow."

Best quote EVAR!

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

November 30th, 2011
09:12 pm
[User Picture]

[Link]

Michele Bachmann: U.S. Embassy In Iran (Which Doesn't Exist) Would Be Closed Under My Watch</span>

We haven't had an embassy there since 1980.

So, my questions for Michele Bachman are:

1. Since the embassy was closed in 1980, do you mean you would build a time machine and go back to the 1970s and close it down earlier? What year would you close it down?

2. When you said this it got a huge amount of applause. Will you repeat the line even though you know it is misguided because you know it gets a lot of applause? What does this say about the people coming to your rallies?

3. What other things that don't exist would you shut down?

Tom

(10 comments | Leave a comment)

November 21st, 2011
10:12 pm
[User Picture]

[Link]

Why don't support the "It gets better" campaign.

I was in high school in the 1980s. If you recall, there were some highly visible suicide attempts and it was a hot topic in educational circles. One high school had a circle of friends attempt suicide the same week and rumors of "suicide pacts" among students were blown out of proportion. If you said "I couldn't live without my best friend" you were rushed to the school shrink.

In reaction to all this, school across the country adopted "suicide education" programs. I know my high school did. Heath class added a 2-week segment where we learned all about suicide. Why people do it. How many people do it. How people do it. The 5 most common ways to do it (in graphic detail... including facts like which techniques don't work and are just "a way to get attention" vs. the techniques that really, really work!) Intense stuff!

And what happened? The number of suicides skyrocketed! Yes, it back-fired. Being in high school sucks for most people but it's just "a bad day" and you move on. Unless, of course, you've just gone through half a month of instruction on that includes graphic details of which direction to slice your wrist for the greatest dammage (yes, Ms. Lally my teacher gave us that detail).

As you can imagine, schools panicked but eventually changed the curriculum. The new curriculum focused on teaching kids to identify the signs that a friend might be suicidal, how to talk with them about getting help, and where those sources of help are. That's what finally reduced the suicide rate.

So....

When you are being bullied you don't believe it will ever end and you believe it has no solution. I'm not a shrink but shrinks have told me that people in that situation talk about suicide but don't do it because they are so depressed that they don't believe they will be successful. Nothing else is going right, why would that? It's ironic but people tend to commit suicide when things get a little better, they feel empowered, and that empowerment lets them do something they've been wanting to do for ages. Sad but true.

The videos were saying, "you're right... but it gets better if you wait it out". If I had been told that when I was being bullied I would not be here today. It just re-enforces the futility of it all. "You're saying I'm right that it really doesn't have a solution?? OMG! I have to wait until I'm an adult? That's centuries from now!" Remember when you were 15-16 and it felt like adulthood was a million years away?

Luckily when I was bullied I was given different advice. My next door neighbor was a police officer. I don't know if my parents arranged this or if he decided to do it on his own, but he took me aside and gave me two bits of advice. First, bullies only respect other bullies. Second, a punch to the nose doesn't damage a person permanently but a nosebleed is super dramatic and everyone will remember it. It's red and messy and looks really impressive. As a kid that got a lot of nosebleeds I totally understood what he was saying. He gave me a quick lesson on how to throw a punch, instructing me that every punch should be aimed at the nose, anything else is a waste of energy. One good hit, a little blood, and nobody will ever pick on your again.

So the next week at the bus stop when Keith and Landon came to pick on me I was ready. I "put up my dukes" and started hopping side to side. I saw an opening and threw a punch. I didn't connect, but my fist in his face shocked the hell out of him. "That kids CRAZY!" Keith said. "You could have hurt someone! Daaaaamn! We were just kidding!" said Landon. Oh yeah, "kidding"... months of picking on and hitting me was "kidding". Nice rationalization, guys.

For the rest of the year Keith and Landon, two of the biggest bullies in the neighborhood, stayed on the opposite side of the bus stop each morning and never came near me.

Four years later I got picked on again. Locker room. Swing and connect. Nosebleed. Principle's office. He looked at the two of us, assumed the effeminate kid (me) couldn't possibly have been the trouble maker so I was off the hook.

So, here's why I never made my own "it gets better" video. I didn't want to say "it gets better... just wait for it". I didn't want to be Ms. Lally with the well-intentioned but back-firing advice. I wanted to explain how to throw a good punch. Let some blood splatter. Make a statement.

But in the middle of seeing all those videos with the happy adults I figured... well... maybe I should wait 6 months and then make my video.

Oh, and by the way... the next town over from where I live a gay teen committed suicide on Thursday. She was head of her school's Gay/Straight Alliance. No exactly the bullied, down-trodden, lacking-for-support kid you'd think would end it all.

I didn't know her but I wish I could have taught her to throw a punch.

Tom Limoncelli, Nov 21, 2011

(22 comments | Leave a comment)

September 20th, 2011
09:05 am
[User Picture]

[Link]

"Gnu Public License" Policy question
[Note: I've hurt my shoulder and typing is painful. This will be terse and I may not correct typos.]

I thought this would be directly in the Gnu Public License but I don't see it anywhere.

How soon after I write the code (i.e. make changes to a GPL-licenced work) do I need to release the change?  Obviously "immediately" doesn't make sense... how soon is now?  After each keystroke?  No.  After I save the file?  no.  After I'm fairly sure it works as expected?  (I could just use the excuse "it isn't ready yet" over and over and never actually release the change).

I had heard it was 12 months (or was it 6 months?) but I don't see that in the license.  (I admit I skimmed it, but I also grepped for the words "day" "month" and "year")

The FAQ says:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic

So, I assume it is "as soon as you release it to the public" but is there precident for waiting some amount of time?

(8 comments | Leave a comment)

June 29th, 2011
09:29 pm
[User Picture]

[Link]

Sysadmins in the Chicago area
I lose track of where my e-friends have moved to.  Do I have any sysadmin friends in the Chicago area? 

(6 comments | Leave a comment)

June 15th, 2011
08:26 am
[User Picture]

[Link]

Virtual Gift
Whoever just anonymously bought me a virtual gift... THANKS!

(Leave a comment)

[<< Previous 10 entries]

Tom's Homepage Powered by LiveJournal.com